by Ian Mosley

It’s hard to believe, but some European countries are actually worse off with regards to uncontrolled immigration than the US. Slowly, they are being forced kicking and screaming all the way to confront the issue, because unlike the North American continent, there are no vast unsettled spaces in Europe, and nowhere for the native-born whites to run.

As in the United States, the media is playing the sad violins for the poor persecuted little immigrants. A recent Associated Press article is typical: “In the video, 15-year-old Arigona Zogaj’s voice broke as she threatened to kill herself unless her family was reunited in Austria. Her father and four siblings were deported to Kosovo late last month after years of living in Austria. But Arigona, who has managed to elude authorities, said the only person she knew in Kosovo was her grandmother, and that her prospects for the future there were slim. ‘I just want us to be able to continue to live here,’ she said in German while sitting against a white wall in an undisclosed location. The video was given to Austrian broadcaster ORF and surfaced Friday.”

Wasn’t Kosovo supposed to become a “paradise” after the US war against Serbia? You don’t mean an Albanian-controlled Kosovo has become a Third World backwater, and the Albanians would rather die than lose out on the European welfare, they’re getting in places like Austria.

The AP article notes: “The Zogaj family’s story has fanned a fiery debate in Austria about deporting well-integrated foreigners who seek asylum and often try to stay on illegally when their applications are rejected. It is a debate similar to those in other European countries, where conflicts about immigration are often tied to questions of national identity and humanitarianism. In Austria, the crux of the issue is an immigration law that took effect in January 2006 and, among other things, sets stricter guidelines on qualifying for residency. While proponents claim it has helped reduce the number of applications for asylum and slowed immigration, opponents say it causes inhumane hardship by uprooting people who, in some cases, have lived in Austria for years.” So if you do something illegal long enough, that makes it OK?

The same article continues: “Another case that has grabbed the public’s attention has been that of the Milicis—a family from Kosovo with six young children. The Milicis lived in Austria since 2005, but authorities rejected their asylum application and a further request to stay on humanitarian grounds. When they didn’t go voluntarily, police arrived unannounced at the family’s front door early one morning late last month. On Tuesday, they were put on a flight back to the Balkans.”

You mean the Austrian cops are actually ENFORCING THE LAW and PHYSICALLY REMOVING people who are in their country unlawfully? Gasp! Shock! Horror! Now can maybe WE start doing that here in the United States?

Wasn’t the massive US attack on Serbia back in 1999 intended to create a “free and democratic” Kosovo? So why do these people find it necessary to seek asylum elsewhere? Could it be that the only effect of the “liberation” of Kosovo has been the establishment of the Albanian Mob as the premier drug dealers in Europe? Or maybe that was the real goal of Clinton’s war on Serbia.

The AP article also notes: “Other European countries are grappling with the same problem. In France, President Nicolas Sarkozy has taken a hard stance, and the country is racing to meet a target of deporting 25,000 illegal immigrants by the end of the year. But the moves are causing tension, especially after some people have been hurt trying to elude authorities. In the Netherlands, the first act of the new parliament elected in November 2006 was to halt deportations set in motion by the previous government. Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende’s new government declared an amnesty for up to 30,000 people. New asylum seekers and illegal immigrants still face a tough regime, kept in camps while their cases are handled. Even legal immigrants must pass language tests before coming and take citizenship classes in order to remain.”

Third World immigrants are undesirable in any White nation. They drain money from government-provided social services and raise taxes on the White population. They almost never pull their own weight. They demand free education, food, apartments —all at the expense of the government. The liberals may want to swing the immigration doors wide open permanently and they may want to smear as “racist” anyone who opposes their policy, but the truth is undeniable. The non-White invaders hate their own homelands because they are poor, corrupt and backward, and that is exactly what Europe will become if it absorbs too many of these people.