by Jeff Davis

By this point in history, the world has pretty much run out of elderly eastern European men to arrest and torture for having been so-called “concentration camp guards” unless they can convince people that the SS had ten year-old officers. There has also been a falling off of Holocaust-related lawsuits through which the Zionists have stolen countless millions of dollars from various hapless Europeans down through the years. The last really big payoff that they got from the “Holocaust” was the Swiss bank shakedown of over a decade ago, when a consortium of Swiss banks shelled out an undisclosed but heavy sum.

But now a  lawyer has suggested a whole new racket; one that will use the courts to shake down foreign governments for generations to come. A recent news article reports ”A Rhode Island lawyer has pioneered a new legal front in the war on terrorism, turning to the collections of major American museums to seek compensation for victims of Middle East suicide bombers. Among the museums and institutions being pursued by David Strachman is the University of Chicago. He wants the university to surrender a treasure trove of ancient Persian artifacts to survivors of an attack staged by Hamas, the militant group that won the recent Palestinian elections. The request was recently sustained by a federal magistrate in Chicago. The reasoning was as straightforward as the implications are far-reaching: Supporters of terrorism should be punished. Hamas is partially financed by Iran. Therefore, Hamas’ victims should be compensated by confiscating Iranian property, making Persian artifacts in U.S. museums, such as University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute, fair game for federal marshals and a moving truck.”

Never mind the fact that Hamas was originally created by the Israelis to draw support away from the PLO. It’s fair to say the Israelis had a bigger role with Hamas than the Iranians. (Some people speculate that al Qaeda may be yet another MOSSAD creation, which may have since sprung a life of its own.) If we’re going to hold Hamas responsible for bombings, then what about the MOSSAD and the Israeli Defense Force? The Israelis admit killing about three Palestinians for every Israeli killed. Doesn’t this suggest that the Palestinians deserve three times as much in reparations?

The Israeli MOSSAD has committed atrocities and assassination, not to mention black operations all around the world. Will Arab victims of the MOSSAD be allowed to file similar lawsuits against Israeli banks or other assets here in the US? Somehow I think this will be yet another glaring double standard.

The University of Chicago is not the only institution which has been targeted. The Field Museum, Harvard University, the University of Michigan, the Detroit Institute of Arts and the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston have been threatened with lawsuits if they don’t pay shakedown money to assorted Zionist interests.  

More and more, the Zionists are using the weapon of the “default judgment” against their political enemies and critics. They file a spurious lawsuit against someone who is either too poor to hire an attorney, or else against someone who has no legal presence in this country, such as the Islamic Republic of Iran, whose functionaries are banned from travel to the United States. In other words, Zionists sue someone whom they know cannot defend themselves in these money-grubbing, corrupt courts.

Once the judge gives them their default judgment, they then attempt to use the law and armed gunmen wearing badges to steal any identifiable property or assets of their victim they can get. It should be emphasized that this attack on the University of Chicago’s Persian collection does not involve a “trial”, but simply an attempt to send in Federal marshals and load the precious artifacts onto a truck and take them away to who knows where, because some creep in a black robe in Washington D.C. signed a piece of paper that the University has no knowledge of, over a bogus lawsuit in which the University itself is not involved in any way. Apparently the first the University knew of the default judgment and execution order was when a gang of Federal gun thugs showed up with a moving van last year and tried to break in and steal the collection; fortunately, the Museum has money and so were able to pay lawyers to rush to a judge to issue a temporary restraining order in time to keep the Persian artifacts from being hauled away.

It is unknown how the plaintiffs intend to convert the collection into cash to buy their Mercedes and swimming pools and department store shopping sprees at Macy’s and Gimbels. Attorney Strachman is also pursuing similar “terrorism” cases against Harvard University and the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. The scope for bogus and frivolous lawsuits of this nature is immense, and it will keep a new generation of lawyers and biased judges busy for decades to come.